Sample format for citing a Country Study: Users and/or publishers requiring specific written confirmation for the record should direct inquiries to Credit line All other text and graphics are in the public domain. The captions for these photographs clearly indicate the protected status of the images.
WORDS TO WHEN THE RIVER RUNS DRY BOOK SERIES
Several of the books in the series contain photographs that have been copyrighted. Responsibility for making an independent legal assessment of an item and securing any necessary permissions ultimately rests with persons desiring to use the item(s). The written permission of the copyright owners is required for distribution, reproduction, or other use of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use or other statutory exemptions. Users should keep in mind that the Library of Congress is providing access to these materials strictly for educational and research purposes. copyright protection (see Title 17, U.S.C.) or other restrictions in the material in this collection, except as noted below. In responseto thefilingofa TitleVI lawsuit(Riosv.The Library of Congress is not aware of any U.S. Pamela Burdman, LawsuitAgainstUC Berkeley PresidentJohnson'sstatementregardsthe rationalefor Rights Under Federal Programs: An Analysisof Title VI of the Civil Rightsġ01968.pdf. Comm'non Civil Rights, Clearinghouse Publication No. Have been prone to assume that"afrightslaws,public universitiesĪction-less"admissionspoliciesand plungingminorityĪdmissionsare the inevitableoutcome of compliancewithstateantiaffirmative Legal scholarshave largelyignoredthistensionĪctionlawsand federalantidiscrimination law. Law- TitleVI oftheCivilRightsActof 1964 and its Like California's Proposition209, Washington'sInitiative200, Michigan'sProposal 2, and Nebraska'sInitiative424. Resolveto admitand educate studentsof all races and ethnicities.Ĭhanged.Butthelawsunderwhichweoperatehavechanged. It is simplejusticethatall shouldsharein programs The DutyTo Complywith Title VI as a Remedial AdmissionDisparitiesas Title VI EffectDiscrimination.1120 Racial Disparityin Lieu ofRacial Parityin Admissions 1098 Genesisand FutureofStateAnti-Affirmativeĭ. Reckoning with the End of AffirmativeActionĪ. State antiactionlaws maypermittheconsideration Ofsufficientmagnitudethat,if unjustified,Ĭonclusionflowsfromthis analysis. With a drumbeat of facts both horrific (thousands of wells in India and Bangladesh are poisoned by fluoride and arsenic) and fascinating (it takes 20 tons of water to make one pound of coffee), the formerNew Scientist news editor documents a 'kind of cataclysm' already affecting many. Nation"- to analyze selectiveCaliforniaand Washington 'A strongand scarycase that a worldwide water shortage is the most fearful looming environmental crisis. ThatTitleVI imposeson thesame instituabolishaffirmative ItsĬollegeadmissions,dictatedin large measureby its importancein collegecreatesan incentive Consequently,Īchave beenproneto assumethat"affirmativeĪdmissionsare theinevition-less"admissionspoliciesand plungingminorityĪctionlaws dictatesuch a result. UCLA School ofLaw CritiFacult圜olloquium,LoyolaLaw SchoolFacultyWorkshop,Ĭal Race StudiesWorkshop,Southeast/SouthwestĬollegeofLaw,and theChiefJusticeEarlWarin HigherEducation: The Past and FutureofĪctionlaws and federalantidiscriminationlaw. Ticlealso benefitedfromcommentsmade byparticipants Specialthanksto ShawnChangĪnd ElliotHenryfortheirsuperbresearchassistanceand to NaShaun Neal and BarmakNassirianforlocatinghelpfulresearchmaterialsrelevantto thisproject.ThisArin theUCLA School of Law I wishto thankWilliamĭevon Carbado,RobertChang,BriettaClark,KimberleĬherylHarris,AllanIdes,AdrianLeBlanc,AlexandraNatapoff,Īn earlierdraftofthispaper. Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles,at Loyola MarymountUniversi ty Tiesfromusingselectioncriteriathathave theeffectĪpplicantson thebasis of theirrace. At thesame time,federalantidiscrimination To complywith thesenew voter-approved,Īctionpolicies,and thishas had a negativeimpacton minority Tion 209, Washington'sInitiative200, Michigan's Proposal 2, and Neantibraska'sInitiative424. THE RIVER RUNS DRY: WHEN TITLE VI TRUMPS STATEĪctionare waginga national battleoverraceOpponentsof affirmativeīallotinitiativeslikeCalifornia'sProposiconsciousadmissionsthrough This content downloaded from 130.130.37.84 on Sat, 00:14:58 UTCĪll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.įor more information about JSTOR, please contact of Pennsylvania Law Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to University of JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
WORDS TO WHEN THE RIVER RUNS DRY BOOK ARCHIVE
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at Published by: University of Pennsylvania Law Review Source: University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol.
The River Runs Dry: When Title VI Trumps State Anti-Affirmative Action Laws
0 kommentar(er)
